COMPARISON OF SUBJECT MEAN AGAINST GROUP MEAN Subject Subject Group Diff. Indic. Group grade grade mean size HISTORY 38.11 39.21 -1.10 106.60 35 MATHS F 24.25 30.94 -6.69 102.86 8 MATHS I 37.60 37.47 0.13 105.58 15 MATHS H 45.52 44.11 1.41 109.10 25 PHYSICS 37.92 40.19 -2.26 105.71 26 CHEMISTRY 39.48 41.35 -1.87 108.83 23 BIOLOGY 42.25 39.87 2.38 106.95 48 ASTRONOMY 31.00 43.90 -12.90 121.67 4 DRAMA 40.00 34.40 5.60 98.57 9 LATIN 35.20 44.04 -8.84 113.78 10 ROMAN CIVILIZATION 43.60 39.87 3.73 114.25 5 HOME ECONOMICS 46.00 38.37 7.63 99.25 9 CDT 36.80 38.40 -1.60 105.31 15 GERMAN 49.00 43.17 5.83 117.50 4 FRENCH 37.12 39.87 -2.74 106.95 48 COMPUTER STUDIES 38.36 41.00 -2.64 106.64 11 GEOGRAPHY 40.49 39.73 0.76 106.41 41 ENGLISH LANGUAGE 42.12 39.87 2.26 106.95 48 ENGLISH LITERATURE 40.87 39.87 1.01 106.95 48 H & A OF MUSIC 42.00 40.22 1.78 125.00 3
This is a very useful table for one can see at a glance the average grade achieved in all the subjects sat. The group grade gives an indication of the ability of the students sitting each subject judged by their actual performance in these particular examinations. The differential shows how each subject fared with the pupils who studied it compared to the other subjects those particular pupils sat.
The indicator average (mean) score gives a measure of the ability of the pupils who sat a particular subject judged by whatever test was administered previously.
The above analysis sheet is also available for girls and boys separately.
Things to consider
Do not expect the column of differences to add up to zero: it will not, for each group of students sitting a particular subject will sit a different range of subjects according to the options scheme in place.
Beware making an assumption about a particular subject's performance until you have checked on the numbers sitting it. Very small numbers in a subject can lead to distorted performance figures.
Some subjects are simply harder than others, therefore it is unfair to criticize them in comparison to a subject that is less difficult. It is better to look at trends over a number of years to see if a particular year's results are aberrant and then search for reasons eg. change in syllabus, different teachers, smaller numbers in the group etcetera.
By becoming involved in a consortium approach to the analysis of examination results, it is possible to compare your own school's figures, as per this table, with those of other schools. It then very quickly becomes apparent which subjects are harder than others and performance of a department can be judged in relation to the same subject area in other schools with similar ability groupings.
For more information about this site, Tel. 01963 34128 or E-mail: info@bstubbs.co.uk
SPA Home page
Further GCSE analyses
A-level analyses